Life is an ultramarathon

banner adapted from ultrafondus.com

to content | to menu | to search form

Thursday 25 September 2008

5

... will be my race number tomorrow on the Hardmoors 110. Less than 24 hours before the start now! Kilos of food and all the gear packed, ready to go. The weather forecast looks perfect, touch wood, no snow, no rain, not too cold, not too hot. One less excuse not to finish...

weather York Hardmoors

Ultra (too?) confident.

Thursday 18 September 2008

Hmmm...

Mike just came across another blog with the same name as mine: lifeisanultramarathon.blogspot.com. He started blogging in March 2008, and seems a devoted Christian. This is somehow amusing, because when I created the blog and searched about this name in 2006, the only reference I found was about Christianity - see my first entry.

Although this name is obviously not registered or reserved whatsoever, I can't deny it makes me feel a bit uneasy.

Ultra copy.

Monday 15 September 2008

Famous last words...

I just found an e-mail I wrote at the end of April, ie. 2 months before the Ironman. It reads:
For me the marathon should be the "easy" bit - touch wood.
I mustn't have touched enough wood ...

Ultra forecast.

Thursday 4 September 2008

A couple of interrogations about the Hardmoors

Hardmoors 110 will take place in 3 weeks now, and I'm still uncertain about a few of things, some of them quite important.

1. Poles or not poles?
On one hand (*), poles are helpful in steep hills (up and down). And there will be lots of up and downs in the moors. On the other hand, poles are a real burden when it's relatively flat. You just don't know what to do with them. Therefore I've decided not to use them for the race, and trained accordingly. But I'm still unsure...

2. What map?
There are several mapping options:
ScaleWeightWaterproofnessNotes
none0gindestructibleno very helpful
Footprint Cleveland Way map~1:4500050gplastic caseno GPS grid, old
Explorer Active maps OL26 & OL271:25000400glaminateddoesn't cover final segment
National Trail guide book1:25000300gnullcould take it apart to make road sheets
Hand make roadbook1:25000?null
Current preference: OS maps, and for sure if the weather forecast looks bad.

3. What navigation tools?
I could take the GPS (potentially with preloaded checkpoints or even the whole route), a compass, both or nothing at all. Current choice: nothing at all.

4. What food?
If I want to eat 2 energy gels per hour, I'll need to take no less than 72 of them. That's about 5kg if I go for the SiS GO... I'll also need some savoury things such as Tucs biscuits.

5. Where to stay?
I'm considering the campsite at Filey, because it's cheap and you can come back from the race at any time of the day or the night. But that also means a bit less comfort after the race, especially if it's rainy.

Any thoughts?

Ultra interrogations.

(*) Actually, on both hands :)

Tuesday 2 September 2008

Team Sláinte Dublin Marathon Challenge

Frequent readers know that I'll try to run the Dublin Marathon at the end of October. I'll actually be running with Team Sláinte (sláinte means "cheers" in Irish), along with 5 other runners.
Half of the team will run his first marathon. It might look like a small business for me compared to the Hardmoors, but indeed, it will take place only a month after the Hardmoors! So it may end up quite tough for me too.

Not being allowed to drink fresh Guiness in its own native city before the race, we will need your support. We'll run for Cancer Research UK in order to help to fund research into a problem affecting many millions of people worldwide. We've set our target fairly high, with a £3000 objective. Please pay Team Sláinte web page a visit and consider donating!

Team members:

Andy
Team Slainte - Andy

Dan
Team Slainte - Dan

Dave
Team Slainte - Dave

Julien
Team Slainte - Julien

Pete
Team Slainte - Pete

Rachel
Team Slainte - Rachel



Many Thanks

Ultra high fundraising target.

Monday 1 September 2008

Energy gels: a subjective comparative test

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to be a scientific comparison between energy gels. It is compilation of nutrition facts about most of the energy gels commonly available in the UK and France, complemented by a subjective comment on their taste and texture. Please feel free to comment on it.
  • Update 18/10/2008: corrected Honey Stinger weight, added Hammer.
  • Update 14/12/2009: added Over Blast, Overstim.s and mX3.
  • Update 12/01/2010: added Carboshotz.
I've tried to buy most of the gels I could find in shops or online. The most common in UK shops are PowerGel, High5 and SiS GO, but when you look carefully around, there are quite a few of them: I've ended up with nearly 3kg of running treats! The idea was to taste them for real and not only to report their composition in a table.
However, there are a couple of other gels I haven't tested: GU gel (the one all Americans are talking about, but can't find a UK retailer), EAS energy gel (looks more designed for body builders), Cyto gel (sold only by 24 pack), Clif Shot Energy Gel (can't find a UK retailer), Fireball, Cytomax Gulp'n Gel. Also, I didn't try the full range from High 5, assuming they must be fairly similar. High 5 IsoGel Plus has extra caffeine (35mg) and High 5 IsoGel X'treme is designed to "boost energy, focus and agression", although the official website is very evasive on the actual content.

I will probably update this page later on if I can get hold of other products.

gels

Weight

Most gels provide about 100KCal in 40g. Some are provided in bigger resealable pouches intended for several usages to pack up to 300KCal. The gels with the most important level of sugar will contain less water and therefore have a higher energy-to-weight (E/W) ratio. Pure sugar Honey Stinger reach an amazing 3.24 KCal/g, whether largely water-diluted maltodextrin-based SiS GO gels only pack 1.3 KCal/g!

Table 1: energy and weight

Gel Weight Energy E / W

(g) (Kcal) (Kcal/g)




SiS GO Gel 67 87 1.3
SiS Smart1 Gel 67 88 1.31




High5 IsoGel 38 92 2.42
High5 EnergyGel (Plus) 38 92 2.42
Torq 45 114 2.53
Carboshotz 45 117 2.6
Squeezy Gel 25 65 2.6
PowerGel 41 109 2.66
Carb BOOM Gel 41 110 2.68




Isostar Actifood 90 187 2.08
Lucozade Carbo Gel 45 123 2.73
mX3 extreme 25 74 2.96
Scientec Nutrition Over Blast 25 74 2.96
Overstim.s (Energix / Antioxidant) 27 80 2.96
Aptonia Energy Gel 70 208 2.97
Maxim Gel 100 300 3
Overstim.s (Coup de fouet / Red Tonic) 25 81 3.24
Honey Stinger Gel 32 120 3.75


Carboyhdrate type

They are basically 3 kinds of gels available, hence the 3 groups in the comparison tables. The ones mostly based on maltodextrin (a carbohydrate that isn't sweet, derived from partial hydrolyse of starch), the ones based on glucose syrup (which are extremely sweet) and the ones combining maltodextrin and glucose/fructose. Some researchers suggest that a ratio 2:1 maltodextrin:fructose/glucose (ie. 33% sugar) is optimal. However, most of those are linked somehow to a brand, so it's tricky to get a fair opinion.

Isotonic

Isotonic gels can be consumed without extra water. This can be an advantage, but for most people water is usually needed anyway during a race anyway! I think it's becoming increasingly trendy to say that sport food is isotonic, and I expect most gels to be isotonic in a couple of years.

Caffeine

Some gels include 25 to 90mg of caffeine. As for comparison, the caffeine amount in coffee varies between 40mg (regular espresso) and 300mg (Star***** biggest brew). It's always been controversial whether caffeine is beneficial to long distance running. On one hand it's a psychological and metabolism booster, on the other hand it's a diuretic, it increases the blood pressure and might lead to digestive problems.

Table 2: composition

Gel Carbohydrates Sugar Isotonic Caffeine


(% carb.)






SiS GO Gel maltodextrin 0 YES
SiS Smart1 Gel maltodextrin 0 YES 50





High5 IsoGel maltodextrin, glucose 30 YES
High5 EnergyGel (Plus) maltodextrin, glucose, (fructose) 30 or 46
(30)
Torq maltodextrin, fructose 33
(89)
Carboshotz Corn syrup solids 19
(80)
Squeezy Gel maltodextrin, fructose ?

PowerGel maltodextrin, fructose 38
(25, 50)
Carb BOOM Gel maltodextrin, fructose 11
(50)





Isostar Actifood glucose syrup ?

Lucozade Carbo Gel glucose syrup 15

mX3 extreme glucose syrup, fructose 68

Scientec Nutrition Over Blast glucose, (maltodextrin) ?
30
Overstim.s (Energix / Antioxidant) glucose syrup, (maltodextrin) 35 or 45

Aptonia Energy Gel glucose syrup, (maltodextrin 5%) 58

Maxim Gel glucose syrup 69

Overstim.s (Coup de fouet / Red Tonic) glucose syrup 76

Honey Stinger Gel honey (pure sugar) 100
(32)
* caffeine weight in brackets means that only some of the flavours do contain caffeine.

Cost

Price are hard to compare. If buy bulk you'll obviously pay less. I originally wanted to buy them all by the unit to compare their prices that way. As some gels are only sold in bulk, I eventually had to mix things up a bit. There is a wide range of prices, but on the whole, they are generally fairly expensive for a mix of water, sugar and minerals. Many websites propose recipes to make your own gels for a fraction of the price.

Table 3: cost

Gel Price By E / P

(£)
(Kcal/£)




SiS GO Gel 0.9 10 96.67
SiS Smart1 Gel 1.6 1 55




High5 IsoGel 1 2 92
High5 EnergyGel (Plus) 0.79 1 116.46
Torq 1.25 8 91.2
Carboshotz 1 1 117
Squeezy Gel 0.92 12 70.65
PowerGel 1.2 5 90.83
Carb BOOM Gel 1 5 110




Isostar Actifood 1.95 1 95.9
Lucozade Carbo Gel 1.1 1 111.82
mX3 extreme 1.97 1 37.56
Scientec Nutrition Over Blast 1.6 25 46.25
Overstim.s (Energix / Antioxidant) 1.73 10 46.24
Aptonia Energy Gel 1.45 1 143.45
Maxim Gel 1.39 1 215.83
Overstim.s (Coup de fouet / Red Tonic) 1.87 10 43.32
Honey Stinger Gel 1.17 6 102.56


Sweetness and stickiness

These aspects may not seem of the highest importance, but they do matter. After running for a while, especially if the weather is warm, the stomach can easily get upset. And at that point the last thing you might want is a sweet and sticky gel. On the other hand, a strong sweet taste sometimes feels good when flirting with hypoglycemia. In any case, please remember that taste is personal. This is only to give you an overall idea and you must try them by yourself to make your choice.
Note that the percentage of sugar, although strongly related, is not necessarily proportional to the apparent sweetness. This is due to the use of various kinds of sugar (glucose, fructose), as well as other flavourings and acidity regulators. For example, I found the Carb BOOM gels very similar to the PowerGel, although they have only 11% sugar against 38% for the latter. Also, the Honey Stinger, despite being composed of 100% sugar, surprisingly doesn't taste too badly sweet.

Table 4: personal appreciation

Gel Flavour Sweetness Stickiness Personal mark










SiS GO Gel Subtle not sweet fluid *****
SiS Smart1 Gel Subtle not sweet fluid ****





High5 IsoGel Too strong sweet fluid *
High5 EnergyGel (Plus) Good (choc.) / too strong (citrus) sweet fluid ** / ****
Torq Very good (cherry) very sweet sticky ****
Carboshotz Good a bit sweet a bit sticky ****
Squeezy Gel Good sweet sticky ***
PowerGel OK sweet sticky ***
Carb BOOM Gel OK very sweet sticky ***





Isostar Actifood Good (fruit bits) sweet sticky ****
Lucozade Carbo Gel OK very sweet very sticky **
mX3 extreme OK sweet sticky **
Scientec Nutrition Over Blast OK sweet sticky ***
Overstim.s (Energix / Antioxidant) Good sweet very thick *
Aptonia Energy Gel OK painfully sweet very sticky *
Maxim Gel OK very sweet sticky **
Overstim.s (Coup de fouet / Red Tonic) Good (CF) / Too strong (RT) sweet thick **
Honey Stinger Gel Good very sweet very sticky *****


Conclusion

My final choice is a combo of SiS GO gel and Honey Stinger; the former to be used continuously, as they're easy to swallow and digest even in absence of water; the latter as punctual boosters or hypoglycemia killers. And obviously a couple of spare Crème de marrons for the mental.

Notes:
  • Surprisingly, High 5 EnergyGel composition varies quite a lot depending on the flavour.
  • No official weight is provided for SiS gels, they're measured by volume (ie. 60ml). I've weighted them myself for homogeneous comparison. I suppose the reason for that may either be that they consider them as liquid or that they want to hide their low energy-to-weight ratio.
  • Update 22/12/2008: Trail Goat at iRunFar posted today a similar test of his own, but more oriented towards the US market. You might want to have a look.
You can also browse the whole comparison table at a glance online or download the OpenDocument spreadsheet. These include a bit more information and links to official websites.

Ultra energy.